If there are primitive logical signs, then a valid logic must clearly show how they relate to one another and justify their existence. If logic has fundamental ideas, they must be independent of one another. If a fundamental idea has been introduced, it must have been introduced in all the combinations in which it ever occurs. It cannot, therefore, be introduced first for one combination and later reintroduced for another.
For example, once negation has been introduced, we must understand it both in propositions of the form (~p) and in propositions like (~(p∨q)), ((∃x).~fx), etc. We must not introduce it first for one class of cases and then again for another, since it would then be doubtful whether it means the same thing in both cases, and neither would there be any reason to combine the signs in the same way.
In short, Frege's remarks in The Fundamental Laws of Arithmetic about introducing signs by means of definitions also apply, mutatis mutandis, to the introduction of primitive signs.
The introduction of any new aid into the symbolism of logic is always significant. It should not be introduced in brackets or in a footnote  sneaked in, so to speak. But if a new aid is required at a certain point, place in logic must be explained. We must immediately ask ourselves: Where must it be used?
All numbers in logic need justification; or rather: It must become evident that there are no numbers in logic. Thus, there are no privileged numbers in logic; neither are coordination or classification; nor degrees of the general or specific. The solutions of the problems of logic must be simple, since they set the standard of simplicity.
We have always had a presentiment that there must be an area of investigation whose results  a priori  lie combined in a selfconsistent system. A realm in which it is valid to assert: Simplex sigillum veri.
This log was inspired by "How to Read Wittgenstein" and "Ludwig Wittgenstein: the duty of genius" by Ray Monk. It is based on reading Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus by Ludwig Wittgenstein translated by D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuinness (Routledge and Kegan Paul:1963)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 1
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 2
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 2.01
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 2.02
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 2.03 to 2.063
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 2.1
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 2.2
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 3
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 3.0
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 3.1
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 3.2
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 3.3
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 3.32
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 3.33
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 3.34
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 3.4 to 3.5
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 4
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 4.00
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 4.01 to 4.022
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 4.023 to 4.027
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 4.03
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 4.04
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 4.05 to 4.0621
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 4.1
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 4.12 to 4.1213
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 4.122 to 4.1252
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 4.126 to 4.128
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 4.2 to 4.28
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 4.3 to 4.442
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 4.45 TO 4.4661
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 4.5 to 4.53
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5 to 5.101
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.05 to 5.156
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.11 to 5.132
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.133 to 5.143
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.2 to 5.254
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.3
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.4 to 5.44
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.45
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.46 to 5.472
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.473 to5.476
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.5 to 5.503
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.51
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.52
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.53 to 5.535
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.5351 to 5.5352
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.55 to 5.5571
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.6 to 5.621
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 5.63 to 5.641
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 6
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 6 to 6.01
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 6.1 to 6.1202
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 6.1203
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 6.121 to 6.124
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 6.125 to 6.1271
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 6.13 to 6.2331
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 6.234 to 6.3432
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 6.342 to 6.372
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 6.373 to 6.3751
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 6.5
 Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus 7
Blog Archive

▼
2008
(69)

▼
April
(40)
 The world does not depend on me.
 The relative position of logic and science.
 Mathematics is a method of logic.
 Logic is transcendental.
 One can describe all true logical propositions in ...
 We can do without logical propositions.
 Recognizing a Tautology.
 The propositions of logic are tautologies.
 The General Form of a Truth Function.
 The microcosm.
 The boundary of my language represents the boundar...
 Elemental Propositions.
 Propositions occur in each other only as bases of ...
 Expressions.
 Identity.
 Truth Functions do not Include the Concept All.
 How is this useful?
 Every truthfunction an be obtained by successivel...
 Occam's rule points out that unnecessary signs mea...
 Signs for logical operations are punctuation marks...
 Logic must be clearly constructed from its primiti...
 Logical objects or logical constants in Frege's an...
 All propositions are the result of truth operators...
 The structures of propositions relate internally t...
 Propositions of probability.
 All deduction is a priori.
 Logical Inference.
 A proposition is a truth function of elemental pro...
 The general propositional form is the variable: 'I...
 Tautology and Contradiction.
 Truth Value Tables and Propositions.
 The sense of a proposition.
 A variable is the sign of a formal concept.
 Formal Properties and Relations.
 Logical Form  What can be shown, cannot be said.
 A proposition exhibits matters of fact which both ...
 Every proposition must make sense on its own.
 A proposition can be true or false only by being a...
 A proposition must have just as many degrees of fr...
 A sentence must use old expressions to tell us som...

▼
April
(40)
No comments:
Post a Comment